Henchman Wins UI/UX Award – Artificial Lawyer

Henchman, a pioneer in contract drafting, was declared the winner of the “Best User Experience (UX), Best User Interface (UI) and Design Award” at the prestigious SaaS Awards.

The site doesn’t often deal in prizes, but it’s important that the legal tech world celebrates good UI and UX. actually used By Lawyers – It’s For People fun I feel I can easily get value from using the product.

UI/UX isn’t the whole equation, but it’s an important part. Based in Belgium and with clients in several international markets including the UK, congratulations to his Henchman on being named an outright winner in this category for 2022.

artificial lawyer Then I asked the company: What was the UI/UX secret sauce? If their design approach is better than others, why?

When the Henchman founders started working on the idea of ​​contract drafting technology in 2019, we conducted a ton of qualitative and quantitative research.

‘The following product specifications are our “Five Precepts” It’s there in prototyping, and in engineering today.

A henchman looks like this:

– Plug & Play.

– Dummy proof.

– Work seamlessly within Microsoft Word.

– System independent.

– Language agnostic.

Co-Founder of Henchman, Jorn VanisakkaHe then said:

The company added that it focuses on product improvement through “agile two-week sprints, in-depth user workshops, and dedicated product managers and product owners who act as a bridge between customers and engineering.” rice field.

CTO of Henchman, Wouter Van Lespailconclusion: “Technology should work for the user, not the other way around.”

This is probably the crux of good UI/UX: removing the effort of trying to use a tool. This is of course because you are trying to remove the “work” from the process in the first place. The more “effort” you put into using a tool, the less valuable it becomes.

This has always been a problem with new technology. In many cases the new solution can be as complex as the old one, but in this case we are just using a different approach via software.

The truly beneficial innovations are those that break that pattern and go beyond creating truly unattractive alternative approaches that work very clearly and intuitively and where the desired output value lies. It’s about offering something that “sells itself” for that reason. Arrived very quickly.

Of course, if this was easy, everyone would do it, and companies like Apple (at least in the golden age of Steve Jobs) would be ten pennies, not very rare.

In conclusion, anything that promotes ease of use and speeds time to value should be welcomed in the legal tech arena.